To refute the demand for $60,000 in legal expenses without a fair trial, you can structure your argument as follows:

1. Lack of Due Process: Emphasize that the demand is invalid due to the absence of a fair trial, which is a fundamental right under both state and federal law. Cite relevant case law that supports the necessity of due process in legal proceedings.

2. Unreasonable Legal Fees: Argue that the amount demanded is excessive and not justified by any legal standards or precedents. Provide evidence or examples of typical legal fees for similar cases to demonstrate that the demand is inflated.

3. Failure to Provide Evidence: Request that the opposing party provide detailed documentation justifying the claimed legal expenses. Highlight that without proper evidence, the demand lacks merit.

4. Counterclaims: If applicable, consider asserting any counterclaims or defenses that may negate the demand, such as wrongful eviction or harassment, which could further undermine the legitimacy of the expenses claimed.

5. Jurisdictional Issues: If the demand was made in a jurisdiction where you have not been properly served or where the legal basis for the claim is questionable, highlight these jurisdictional issues to challenge the validity of the demand.

6. Conclusion: Summarize your points, reiterating that the demand for $60,000 in legal expenses is baseless due to the lack of a fair trial, unreasonable fees, and insufficient evidence. Request that the demand be dismissed.

This structured approach will help you effectively articulate your argument against the demand.